Huge propane cavern leaking, neighbors offered relocation
This looks bad for Carbon Capture Storage
October 19, 2009
Barnesville Herald-Gazette
(Georgia) Low levels of propane have been detected in soil and water samples taken on and around the site of a huge underground gas storage cavern near Milner and some residents nearby may be temporarily relocated.
The cavern, owned by Enterprise Propane Terminals & Storage, is located 340 feet underground and holds 220,000 barrels or 9.24 million gallons of propane.
Enterprise is emptying the underground facility in order to further study the situation.
Three above ground tanks at the location contain an additional 90,000 gallons of propane each.
The company detected the leak while testing on its own property.
Subsequent tests on a few neighboring properties have also been positive.
Source:
http://www.barnesville.com/archives/1462-Huge-propane-cavern-may-beleaking;-neighbors-offered-relocation.html
_____________
Police arrest 21 people at UK coal plant protest
October 17, 2009
Reuters
(International) Police clashed with environmental activists and arrested 21 people during a day of protests at a coal-fired power station in central England on Saturday.
While hundreds joined a largely peaceful demonstration outside the main gates of German utility E.ON’s plant in Ratcliffe-on-Soar, Nottinghamshire, scuffles broke out around the perimeter fence when smaller groups tried to break through in an attempt to close the power station.
One policeman was flown to hospital with head injuries after being hurt while trying to keep people from entering the plant.
Protest organizers said several demonstrators suffered minor injuries. Nottinghamshire Police said officers were attacked during “concerted efforts to tear down perimeter fencing and enter the site.” Camp for Climate Action, the environmental campaign group behind the protest, said some of its members needed treatment for bruising and dog bites.
An E.ON spokesman said the plant would continue to operate as normal unless protesters enter operational areas.
“We have increased security and got extra fencing and we are working very closely with police,” he said, adding that E.ON is investing heavily in wind power and has plans to close other coal-powered stations. The protests were due to continue on Sunday morning.
Source:
http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE59G1SU20091017
__________________
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Monday, November 02, 2009
BP fined $87m for Texas explosion
October 30, 2009
BBC
(Texas) British Petroleum has been fined a record $87m (£53m) for failing to correct safety hazards at its Texas City refinery in the U.S. An explosion in 2005 at the Texas plant killed 15 people and injured 180 more.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited 270 violations at the oil refinery, a U.S. Labor Department official said.
BP said it believed it was in “full compliance” with a 2005 settlement agreement with OSHA and would work with the agency to resolve the issue.
The $87m fine is the largest in OSHA’s history.
In 2005, BP paid a $21.3m fine to OSHA and entered into a four-year agreement to repair hazards at the Texas City refinery, which is the third largest in the U.S. The latest fine follows a six-month inspection into whether BP had complied with that agreement.
Source:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8334310.stm
____________________
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Peggy Noonan Recalls When Bush Wrapped Himself in His Own Failure
By Steve M.
No More Mister Nice Blog
October 24, 2009
It's hard to have a simple response to Peggy Noonan's opening paragraphs this week:At a certain point, a president must own a presidency. For George W. Bush that point came eight months in, when 9/11 happened. From that point on, the presidency -- all his decisions, all the credit and blame for them -- was his. The American people didn't hold him responsible for what led up to 9/11, but they held him responsible for everything after it. This is part of the reason the image of him standing on the rubble of the twin towers, bullhorn in hand, on Sept.14, 2001, became an iconic one. It said: I'm owning it.
"I'm owning it." Noonan's partly right about that: after running scared on 9/11 and ducking the situation for a couple of days, Bush began on that Friday to act as if having presided over the worst act of terrorism ever on U.S. soil was a mark of virtue.
In retrospect, it's as if he was pleased about it -- proud of it. Eight years later, I can't help thinking he really was pleased: now he'd be consequential, rather than the no-account black sheep of his family.
It's true that he wasn't held responsible for what led up to 9/11 -- his administration and its propagandists took great pains to shift the blame to his predecessor -- but it's odd how Noonan puts that. She mentions responsibility for what went before (presumably so her right-wing base can think about how it's all Clinton's fault) and responsibility for what came after (it's OK now, if you're a Republican, to say bad things about Bush), but it's as if she still can't face the fact that what we need to talk about is responsibility for what happened on 9/11.
Yes, I'm playing with words a bit -- but it's as if Noonan doesn't want to address the point that something unspeakably horrible happened that day -- and on whose watch? It's as if she can accept the build-up (all the fault of the Democrats) and the aftermath (so much failed Republican promise), but looking at the actual event is unthinkable. Which it wouldn't be if it had happened in a Democrat's administration; then failure to obsess over the awful day would be unthinkable.
Noonan pivots to Obama:Mr. Bush surely knew from the moment he put the bullhorn down that he would be judged on everything that followed. And he has been. Early on, the American people rallied to his support, but Americans are practical people. They will support a leader when there is trouble, but there's an unspoken demand, or rather bargain: We're behind you, now fix this, it's yours.
President Obama, in office a month longer than Bush was when 9/11 hit, now owns his presidency. Does he know it? He too stands on rubble, figuratively speaking -- a collapsed economy, high and growing unemployment, two wars. Everyone knows what he's standing on. You can almost see the smoke rising around him. He's got a bullhorn in his hand every day.
It's his now. He gets the credit and the blame. How do we know this? The American people are telling him. You can see it in the polls. That's what his falling poll numbers are about. "It's been almost a year, you own this. Fix it."
"It's his now." The first eight months of Bush's presidency weren't his, and that's fine, but rubble from a collapse that began long before Obama became president is his rubble. Bush chose to own his rubble (actually, he chose to milk it for sympathy and to wave it like a bloody shirt that justified unrelated foreign adventurism, and inept adventurism than that). But Obama doesn't have agency. We tell him -- or, rather, Noonan, purporting to speak for us, tells him -- what's his responsibility and what isn't.
If you want to use a 9/11 metaphor for Obama, compare him to the people in charge of rebuilding on Ground Zero. Blame him for failing to get that job under way quickly enough. I blame him for not doing enough by now to rein in the fat cats, and not enough to jolt Main Street's economy until we can feel a pulse. And the public is, yes, blaming him for that, too. But, sorry, Peggy: it's not his rubble -- and the public knows that, even if this self-appointed spokeswoman for the public doesn't realize that.
55% Still Blame Bush for Economic Problems --Rasmussen, October 5, 2009 If even Rasmussen gets numbers like that, it's Bush's rubble, even if it's Obama's job to clean it up.
Steve M. blogs at No More Mister Nice Blog.
© 2009 No More Mister Nice Blog All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/143487/peggy_noonan_recalls_when_bush_wrapped_himself_in_his_own_failure/#more
______________
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Company Underbid Embassy Security Contract, Ignored Misconduct, Whistleblowers Say
By Matthew Harwood
Security Management
Sept. 11, 2009
The fallout from the scandal involving private security contractors protecting the U.S. Embassy Kabul continues to rise up the management ladder, according to allegations levied by two ArmorGroup North America (AGNA) whistleblowers.
According to the Associated Press [1]:
James Gordon, former director of operations at ArmorGroup, and John Gorman, a former ArmorGroup manager in Kabul, told reporters they were forced out after trying to get the company to fix a long list of problems.
Gordon, who left ArmorGroup in February 2008, said he alerted the State Department to shortcomings in personnel, equipment and discipline that created security risks, but little changed.
In a whistleblower retaliation lawsuit filed Wednesday in federal court, Gordon said ArmorGroup withheld from Congress information about employees who went to brothels in Kabul known to house trafficked women.
ArmorGroup's "goal was to maximize their profits, provide a fig leaf of security at the embassy, and pray to God that nobody got killed," Gordon said.
Last week, the Project on Government Oversight wrote a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton [2]detailing AGNA contract abuses, including bizarre booze-soaked sexual hazing, harsh working conditions, and language barriers among guards, that undermined security at the embassy. Graphic pictures of the hazing have been revealed on many Web sites, including this one.
Photo released by Project on Government Oversight
Gormon told reporters that the company cut costs by extending shifts from 8 to 12 hours and by shortening the number of shifts from 5 to 4 days. He also alleged that the company did not properly vet the employees it hired, which helped contribute to abuses and misconduct.
Gordon, who is currently working for another security contractor in Kabul, has filed a whistleblower protection lawsuit against AGNA. He is suing for back pay and punitive damages, reports CNN.com [3].
Among the more shocking allegations, Gordon's lawsuit reveals one security contractor had to be forcibly removed from a brothel during working hours. Gordon unsuccessfully tried to get the employee fired. He failed, he said, because other guards, including an AGNA medic and supervisor frequented the same brothel—one that allegedly dealt in trafficked sex slaves.
Guards' extracurricular activities also led to an outbreak of sexually transmitted diseases, Gordon alleges. In response to these incidents, Gordon tried to enforce a "no-brothels policy," which was met with "outright hostility" by the company, he said.
According to CNN.com, Wackenhut Services Inc., which owns AGNA, responded to Gordon's allegations, calling them "overstated, ill-founded, not based on any personal knowledge, or otherwise lacking in legal merit."
Source:
http://www.securitymanagement.com/news/company-underbid-embassy-security-contract-ignored-misconduct-whistleblowers-say-006188
________________
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Secret Trafigura report said ‘Likely Cause’ of Illness was Release of Toxic Gas from Dumped Waste For these people [living or working near the dump sites], the possible consequences are burns to the skin, eyes and lungs, vomiting, diarrhoea, loss of consciousness and death.” It warns that the sulphur chemicals can break down in the environment and release hydrogen sulphide, a “highly toxic” gas that can kill. It says the effects of the release of this gas were reported and “we conclude hydrogen sulphide release to have been the likely cause”.
A suppressed report which details how an oil company dumped toxic waste in Africa that may cause serious burns has been released following a parliamentary row over freedom of speech.
By Martin Beckford and Holly Watt
Telegraph UK
Oct 16, 2009
The study commissioned just weeks after the incident in West Africa concluded that the dumping would have been illegal under European pollution laws and suggests that the “likely cause” of the illness reported by locals was the “significant release” of potentially lethal gas.
The report had been kept secret after Trafigura, one of the world’s largest independent oil trading firms, obtained a "super injunction" that threatened the centuries-old privilege of newspapers to report what MPs can say freely in the Commons.
On Friday night, as the High Court gagging order was lifted, senior figures at Trafigura admitted their approach may have been “heavy-handed” and insisted it had not been their intention to try to gag Parliament.
The firm also maintained that the damning report was only an unfinished draft study, while its author insisted that it was written “without reference to the underlying specific evidence”.
Trafigura denies anyone died as a result of the waste dumping and says they only suffered “inconveniences” such as “flu-like symptoms”.
Pierre Lorinet, Trafigura’s chief financial officer, told The Daily Telegraph:“Effectively that report was a draft report, a work in progress, very much when the event was happening and that report was effectively an analysis of possibles, as opposed to basing itself on material analysis, experts working into what did happen on the Ivory Coast.
Because we have been the recipient of quite a lot of inaccurate reporting, we decided that our best course of action at the time was to get the injunction, because we didn’t want more inaccurate reporting on things which are very clearly wrong effectively.
“It is a heavy-handed approach, absolutely. With hindsight, could it have been done differently? Possibly.
“The injunction was never intended to gag Parliament or attack free speech. “Our experience until then, some of the reporting, people weren’t necessarily interested in our side of the story and to be fair it is probably a mistake that we have made over time, we have not been open enough.”
In 2006 Trafigura, a privately-owned, Dutch-registered company that has offices in London, had chartered a tanker, the Probo Koala, to carry a cargo of cheap, dirty petrol known as coker gasoline that it hoped to clean up for a profit.
After using caustic soda and a catalyst to remove sulphur from the fuel, it was left with waste products known as slops that were to be disposed of in Amsterdam. But Trafigura was told that the cost of handling the foul-smelling residue would be far higher than initially thought.
The waste was pumped back onto the ship and in August taken to Abidjan, the biggest city in Ivory Coast, where a local contractor called Compagnie Tommy unloaded it and dumped it at as many as 18 landfill sites across the city at night.
Within days there were reports that locals had suffered injuries from exposure to the dumped waste, with a UN official claiming recently that 108,000 had fallen ill.
Alleged victims came together to launch Britain’s largest ever class action against the oil firm, which was due to be heard at the High Court.
Last month Trafigura agreed an out-of-court settlement that will offer about £950 compensation to each of 31,000 people without accepting liability.
A joint statement issued by both sides following the out of court settlement last month said that more than twenty independent experts from a number of fields have investigated the incident.
“These independent experts are unable to identify a link between exposure to the chemicals released from the slops and dealths, miscarriages, still births, birth defects, loss of visual acuity or other serious and chronic injuries. Leigh Day and Co, [who represented the victims] in the light of the expert evidence now acknowledge that the slops could at worst have caused a range of short term low level flu-like symptoms and anxiety," the statment continued.
Trafigura has already paid more than £100m to the Ivory Coast authorities for a clean-up operation and still faces court action in Amsterdam for the alleged illegal export of toxic waste.
Soon after the incident Trafigura’s lawyers commissioned Minton, Treharne & Davies, a firm of Wales-based scientific analysts, to look into the “potential composition” of the slops discharged from the ship.
The report was not made public by Trafigura, which maintains that the slops could not have caused the illness reported.
But a leaked copy of the Minton report found its way into the hands of journalists from The Guardian newspaper.
In September this year, Trafigura took what it now calls the “unenviable step” of asking its lawyers, Carter-Ruck, to seek an injunction preventing publication of the report.
It says it did so solely to prevent biased reporting, but the terms of the injunction appeared to prevent reporting of the fact that Paul Farrelly, a Labour MP, had tabled a question relating to Trafigura.
This week users of Twitter, the popular “micro-blogging” website, alerted the world to the Commons order paper listing the question and a website for leaked documents where the Minton report could be read.
On Friday night the High Court injunction banning reporting of the Minton paper was lifted.
The long-suppressed report explains the harmful nature of the chemicals “likely to have been present” following the dumping of the slops and states: “
The report also states that the disposal of the liquid, corrosive and flammable waste would be “forbidden” under EU rules.
But Trafigura disputes the content of the report, which it says was left unfinished after a more detailed investigation of the actual slops by the Netherlands Forensic Institute.
The oil firm says hydrogen sulphide was not present in the dumped waste.
A statement produced last night by John Minton, the report’s author, said:
“Any suggestion that the draft September 2006 report was anything other than an initial desktop study, which remained in draft and which was quickly superseded when we were first provided with reliable facts, would be wholly incorrect.”
Source:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6350262/Secret-Trafigura-report-said-likely-cause-of-illness-was-release-of-toxic-gas-from-dumped-waste.html
_________________
